Archive for July, 2010

Thinking About Relocating Members of Your Staff? It may cost you…

July 30th, 2010

Are you considering opening a branch overseas?
The 2010 The Mercer survey for the use of companies thinking about opening businesses in faraway countries is out. The results may come as a surprise. The study covers 214 cities across five continents, comparing costs of 200 items including housing, transport, food, clothing, household goods and entertainment.

Luanda has hit the top spot as the most expensive city
Ever heard of Angola, capital city of Angola? Angola is on the West coast of Africa about one third up from the bottom. Well, Luanda is the most expensive city for corporate expats, according to the study which includes three African cities in the top 10 for the first time.

Luanda
The population of Luanda is about 5 million and the most widely used language is Portuguese. There is a small population of European origin, especially Portuguese. Luanda is largely influenced by Portuguese culture so Portuguese beer is widely consumed, although Heineken and Carlsberg and some local beers make an appearance. Some excellent Portuguese wines are also available.

Tokyo to Karachi
The next most expensive city is Tokyo and then Moscow and Geneva. At the other end of the scale Pakistan’s second city Karachi is the cheapest, according to Mercer.

Middle East
In the Middle East, Tel Aviv is the most expensive city in 19th spot followed by Abu Dhabi in 50th place and Dubai in 55th, while Tripoli is the cheapest at 186th, followed by Jeddah and Muscat in 181st and 176th place.

Back to Africa
Nathalie Constantin-Metral who is in charge of compiling the annual survey, says “African cities now figure prominently, reflecting the growing economic importance of the region to global companies across all business sectors.” After Luanda, the Chadian capital N’Djamena in third place followed by Libreville in Gabon in seventh place – the biggest number of Africa capitals in a top 10 usually dominated by Asian and European cities. “Cities in the developing world are not cheap for expatriates working there,” said Constantin-Metral. “Firms have to provide staff with the same standard of living as at home.”

Asia
Three Asian cities make the top 10 list: Tokyo in second, Osaka in 6th place, while Hong Kong is in 8th position. Singapore is not far behind in 11th, followed by Beijing in 16th, Nagoya in Japan in 19th, Shanghai in 25th and Taipei in 78th – while in India, Delhi is the most expensive on 85, followed by Mumbai on 89 and Bangalore on 190.

Australia
In Australia, Sydney is in 24th spot followed by Melbourne on 33 and Brisbane on 55, while Adelaide is the cheapest on 90th. New Zealand has Auckland on 149th, while Wellington is the cheapest in 163rd spot.

Europe
Moscow is the most expensive European city in 4th spot, ahead of Geneva in 5th, Zurich in 8th and Copenhagen in 10th, according to the rankings based on a survey conducted in March this year. London is joint 17th with Paris.

Posted in Employment | No Comments »

Looking After Your Money

July 29th, 2010

How to preserve your capital

As global financial markets continue to yo-yo in brutal swings, and with deposit and bond yields returning next to nothing, many investors are searching for ways to still have market exposure but without the risk.

Risk vs reward

Most investors are familiar with the principal: The higher the risk, the greater the potential reward. Conversely, minimum risk usually implies limited or low returns. How do you know if “risk” is for you? It helps to know what kind of an investor you are, or what type of personality you have. Are you the type of person who enjoys the ups and downs, twists and turns of a roller coaster? Or do you take one look at that roller coaster and head straight for the merry-go-round instead?

The reward

The reward for holding on to your investments until the end of the rollercoaster ride is that they may grow in value. You have to be willing to hold on through the long term in hopes of reaching your goals. If you go the slower route on the merry-go-round, your investments will probably fluctuate less but may not reward you as much in the long run.

Structured products

Over the past 15 years, investment companies have created products that combine exposure to growth with the safety of a deposit or a bond. They succeeded in creating what are termed capital- or principal-protected structured notes. These products allow investors to share in the upside of some predetermined stock index or other asset class while guaranteeing the initial principal invested.

Too good to be true?

If something sounds too good to be true, it probably is. So the question is: “Where’s the catch?” It’s very important to read the small print and understand the structure of each individual product.

The small print

When reading the fine print you may also find the following terms:

• Capped upside:

To make sure your principal is secured, you must sometimes sacrifice the maximum amount you can make. For example, the deal might limit your positive return to 8% in any one year. While that might sound fine, keep in mind that that is not much participation in the index.

• Liquidity:

Structured products are meant for people who intend on holding their investment until maturity. The principal protection guarantee doesn’t apply to people who liquidate early. It’s quite common that if you want to sell before the program is over, even if the underlying investment has gone up, you’ll end up getting back less than you paid. Why? Because there’s not much of a secondary market for these investments, and the redemption fees take their toll.

Speak with your adviser

While structured products may seem ideal because of the growth potential and the principal protection, keep in mind that you need to understand what the terms of each product are prior to investing. Before you consider purchasing them for your portfolio, it’s a good idea to speak with your financial adviser to determine how, and if, they fit into your financial plan.

Posted in Finance | No Comments »

Psst! How Much Is Your Phone Bill This Month?

July 28th, 2010

How did my communications bill get so big?

I passed the $400 last month. I am stunned. In my wildest dreams and in my most outrageous household budgets I never allowed a figure like this. It covers my wife, two teenagers and me. Okay, I understand that it includes the phone, cell-phones, internet and TV, a lot of services all bundled with one company, which was guaranteed to save me up to 15% a month. But $400? For the same monthly payment, I could walk off the lot with a 2010 Toyota Corolla with no money down based on four years of financing.

Too easy

It all looks so easy and it’s so convenient. We can track our children 24 hours a day. We can work from wherever we are. We can stay in touch and be informed instantly about anything we want to know.

I’ll pay

I’ll end up paying with a rather forced smile. This communications account allows me to stay home and work from time to time, so I can’t complain about that. In addition all four of us in the house are downloading information of some sort all the time. The cell-phones are a godsend and none of would think of going out without their cell-phone.

Remember when

I remember that back in 1990, before the age of the Internet, I was spending about $60 or $70 a month on phone and TV. That’s the figure I always remember. Now we’re up to $400 a month. Some increase!

Necessity

We live in the communications age. There is a new device, a new chip, a new service every day. Speed goes up and the costs go down, everything except the bill. Says a communications consultant: “You would have that thought with unemployment rising and people working fewer hours and nobody getting a raise that one of things people would have cut would have been their value-added phone services, Internet services and cable. It turns out not to be the case. Look at the phone companies’ numbers, and how the number of wireless users is going up. Communications has become a necessity.”

Must have and must pay

It follows that if our telecommunications products mean so much to us, we are willing to pay for them. “It’s not just entertainment, it’s all kinds of things, it’s a source of music, a source of social connection, a source of information, a source of mapping. There are just so many potential uses.” One of things we learned during the last recession is that telecommunications services are untouchable.

Drop the land-line

Reports suggest that many people are ditching their home phones. That is a growing trend that is going to continue among younger people. Those people have found a way to cut their costs. If you have a cell phone you are always available and you need a landline in addition. And if the company is paying for the cell phone…? Now, what else can you cut?

Posted in Economy, Finance | No Comments »

« Older Entries